AMD Bulldozer vs Sandy Bridge and K10 performance and benchmark analysis

Written by Gionatan Danti on . Posted in Hardware analysis

User Rating:  / 36
PoorBest 

Memory subsystem

It's now time to look at memory controller performance. AMD was the first to implement an integrated memory controller, but lately its memory controller design had troubles keeping pace with Intel ones. Will Bulldozer change anything? Scott Wasson at techreport.com always did a wonderful job in examining new processors, and he use the industry standard STREAM benchmark to look at memory bandwidth.

Bulldozer STREAM memory benchmark

As you can see, the bulldozer-based FX-8150 show exceptional performance here, beating the mighty Sandry bridge also. Sure, there are other tests with different memory access patters where Sandry bridge remain superior, but this is not the key question.

The point is that Bulldozer memory performance are at least very competitive and way higher than PhenomII's one. So, Bulldozer's memory controller is a strong point of the new architecture. Any slowdown can not be attributed to it.

You have no rights to post comments