<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD Bulldozer and Intel Hyperthreading: two different roads for the same destination</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD Bulldozer and Intel Hyperthreading: two different roads for the same destination</description>
		<link>http://www.ilsistemista.net:80/index.php/hardware-analysis/19-amd-bulldozer-and-intel-hyperthreading-two-different-roads-for-the-same-destination.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.ilsistemista.net:80/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/19.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>kmq says:</title>
			<link>http://www.ilsistemista.net:80/index.php/hardware-analysis/19-amd-bulldozer-and-intel-hyperthreading-two-different-roads-for-the-same-destination.html#comment-129</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Intel approach is better because not all programs are designed for multi core execution!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>kmq</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 23:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.ilsistemista.net:80/index.php/hardware-analysis/19-amd-bulldozer-and-intel-hyperthreading-two-different-roads-for-the-same-destination.html#comment-129</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>roger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.ilsistemista.net:80/index.php/hardware-analysis/19-amd-bulldozer-and-intel-hyperthreading-two-different-roads-for-the-same-destination.html#comment-35</link>
			<description><![CDATA[no benchmark mentions on AMD's approach?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.ilsistemista.net:80/index.php/hardware-analysis/19-amd-bulldozer-and-intel-hyperthreading-two-different-roads-for-the-same-destination.html#comment-35</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
